Leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), Mazi Nnamdi Kanu, has decided to personally take over his ongoing terrorism trial after formally dismissing his team of lawyers during Thursday's court session at the Federal High Court in Abuja. The announcement has stirred major reactions nationwide, given the sensitive and political nature of his case.
The Courtroom Twist
During the court proceedings presided over by Justice James Omotosho, Kanu informed the bench that he would no longer rely on his legal representatives, choosing instead to defend himself. His lead counsel, Kanu Agabi (SAN), confirmed this decision before officially withdrawing from the case, stating that the move came entirely from his client.
When asked by the presiding judge whether he wanted the court to assign a new lawyer, Kanu declined, saying he was fully prepared to handle his own defence “for now.” The court subsequently adjourned to allow him time to organize his arguments and prepare his list of witnesses.
Kanu's Next Move
Reliable courtroom sources revealed that Nnamdi Kanu plans to call over twenty witnesses in his defence. His motion, reportedly filed in person, divides these witnesses into “ordinary but material” and “vital and compellable,” in line with Section 232 of the Nigerian Evidence Act (2011).
Kanu also raised a jurisdictional objection, claiming the Federal High Court lacks the authority to try him under existing constitutional provisions. Despite this, the presiding judge insisted that proceedings will continue in due course.
Implications and Public Reaction
Kanu's decision to represent himself adds a new layer of complexity to a trial that has already drawn widespread domestic and international attention. Legal analysts describe the move as both bold and risky, emphasizing that self-representation in such a high-profile terrorism case could slow proceedings and complicate procedural matters.
Across social media, supporters praised his courage and resolve, while critics argued the step might weaken his defence against the federal charges. The broader public debate now centers on whether his choice reflects confidence in his innocence or frustration with Nigeria's legal system.
What Lies Ahead
The case has been adjourned to allow the IPOB leader to organize his defence strategy. Observers expect the next hearing to focus on witness submissions, evidentiary motions, and jurisdictional challenges that could determine the trial's trajectory.
Regardless of outcome, Kanu's decision ensures that his voice — rather than that of his lawyers — will directly shape one of Nigeria's most closely watched legal battles in years.
+15856533044, +15856533044
-
Nkama SamuelDedicated Support -
Ezugwu EjikeSocial Support -
Okoli JonathanAdmin
